FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideoFierceCable

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy
Related Topics >> Apple | App Store | iPad

Apple's iPad debut generates more criticism than excitement

Tools

To the surprise of absolutely no one, Apple released its long-awaited tablet device Wednesday--dubbed the iPad, the 9.7-inch touchscreen unit promises a user experience optimized for the web, messaging, multimedia, games and ebooks. Shipping with 12 new apps designed especially for the device, the iPad will run almost all of the App Store's 140,000-plus iPhone and iPod touch applications--Apple also released a new iPad software development kit, enabling developers to create new software designed expressly for the device as well as universal apps that run across the iPod, iPhone and iPod touch. In addition, the iPad boasts access to Apple's iTunes digital media storefront--in conjunction with the hardware release, Apple announced its new iBooks app, which includes the iBookstore, featuring books from major and independent publishers.

iPad will arrive in two versions--one with WiFi, the other with both WiFi and 3G support for speeds up to 7.2 Mbps on HSDPA networks. AT&T will serve as Apple's network partner. The iPad will start at $499, about half of what many analysts anticipated and about the same price as Amazon's rival Kindle DX, the large-screen version of its ereader device line. Higher-end iPad models with 3G wireless capacity will cost up to $829.

Given Apple's recent track record, what is surprising is how much skepticism and disappointment greeted the iPad's debut. Among the chief complaints: No support for Adobe Flash, no camera, no multi-tasking capabilities, no monthly television service subscriptions and no 3G service partnership with Verizon Wireless (a hot rumor leading up to the device's release). Some pundits even expected the release of a new iPhone. In addition, the iPad brand name is the subject of much scorn and mockery given its proximity to feminine hygiene products.

"The iPad is a grown up iPod touch. Apple has taken the safe route of offering its existing customers an option that goes beyond today's iPod touch in size and capability, but it has not offered a new category of devices that tackles the 5-6 hours of media we each consume every day," contends Forrester Research analyst James McQuivey. "With no integrated social media for sharing photos, recommending books and sharing home video, the iPad misses a big piece of what makes media so powerful... It had (and still has) the opportunity to create a new media experience in consumers' lives. As it stands, a quick, well-structured response from Amazon in the next version of Kindle could easily be a contender here. That's why I say that the iPad is priced lower than expected because it is less revolutionary than expected."

Fellow Forrester analyst Julie Ask nevertheless pointed out the iPad's potential to boost mobile marketing efforts. "For marketers, the iPad further evolves contextual advertising," she writes. "Consumers will be in an environment where they can act on an impulse to buy. If this product can change and grow media consumption, advertisers will be happy."

For more on the iPad:
- read this release

Related articles:
Most developers planning Apple tablet apps within the year
It's not the Apple tablet that's important, it's the content
Apple testing hundreds of iPhone apps for tablet


SHARE
WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceMobileContent Email Newsletter:

Comments (5) | Post a comment
More stories about Apple   App Store   iPad  

Comments

OMG - another article where the writer is more obsessed about rumors than facts. Perhaps Apple has raised expectations so high with their innovation that nothing will satisfy the pundits.

Here's a couple of suggestions: Why don't you reporters take some time and compare/constrast the iPad functionality, size, price etc to a netbook or to an eReader?

Why don't reporters go ask Verizon why they keep talking about Apple in public forums only to be left standing in a corner every time?

Why don't reporters understand that OEMs are going to build their new devices with GSM technology instead of CDMA so that they can get the global economies of scale?

It seems to me that it's time for someone to ask the right set of questions instead of complaining that Apple's new device doesn't make coffee, take out the garbage and vacuum the floors.

dude calm down. The ipad is useless atleast stuff like the kindle has one goal. what the heck does the ipad do? besdies being an oversized iphone?? errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr it plays music? OMG theres a new idea? LETS PLAY MUSIC

Rule Number 1 - never believe the press and techical experts. They just print anything to get people to read their rags. Look in MacRumors, and find the predictions for the iPhone at the time of its release. Utterly laughable how wrong the alleged experts got it wrong. They should have been sacked for not knowing what they were talking about and orinting embarrassingly inaccurate rubbish.

You spelled printing wrong, Mr. Criticism.

The comment about why GSM is more popular for hardware developers than CDMA becomes even more true as Canadian CDMA providers Bell and Telus have jumped ship to HSPA.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.