Free Newsletter
FloTV's reality check: It's about coverage, price and devices
Free newsletter via e-mail
Tools
The delay in the digital TV transition may have dealt MediaFLO's FloTV a blow but that isn't stopping new President Bill Stone from seeing plenty of opportunity. FloTV had planned to quickly expand to 100 more markets in February but thanks to the DTV Delay Act, which postponed the transition to digital TV until June 12, those plans had to be put on hold--or at least partially on hold.
I spoke with Stone last week, my first interview with him since he joined FloTV in late January. A veteran of Verizon Wireless, Amp'd Mobile and most recently, Handango, Stone said that despite the DTV Delay Act, the company is still expanding where it can. Because Flo TV's spectrum is in channel 55, Stone said some of the broadcasters are making the transition early because it costs them to keep transmitting in analog. "If we are within the interference guidelines, we can fire up those markets," Stone said. "We are quietly working behind the scenes so that we are ready when everything goes digital."
But coverage isn't the only challenge facing FloTV. I questioned Stone about the price; Verizon and AT&T both sell the service bundled with other data services. He said FloTV offered through other distribution partners such as Audiovox (which plans to use FloTV to deliver live TV in vehicles) may offer consumers a different pricing scenario. "We need to make sure we have the price points right to fit the value of the content," Stone said, without revealing too many details. However, don't expect a pure ad-supported model. "I don't see a model for a free service," he said.
Once FloTV is able to expand into the additional 100 markets, Stone says there will likely be more Media FLO devices on the market. Scale is everything and more markets equates to more distribution partners, more devices and more subscribers. "For us, the network is all about scale. Once you have the network built, you can get as many customers as you need without expanding capacity," Stone said.
DTV roadblocks aside, Stone's vision for FloTV seems clear: Increase coverage, build distribution, adjust the price point and grow device selection. If he can accomplish all those things, I suspect we will finally see the momentum in mobile TV that we've been patiently waiting for. -- Sue
Comments
Posted by Anonymous | October 27, 2009 - 2:04am
will I be able to get the stream on my laptop using wi-fi hot spots?
Posted by Anonymous | December 3, 2009 - 7:25pm
I can do the same thing for free using my Sling Box.
Posted by Dr. Yusuf Al-Kindi | December 14, 2009 - 3:52pm
It is a silly device which will have a very limited market. Why pay $30 a month for a dedicated functionality device, when you can get TV and TV like channels on an iPhone?
Posted by SpongebobSquareguy | December 17, 2009 - 10:53pm
my cousins live in San Antonio, and they're pretty coolio. The only thing is, everytime we bring them to Houston, its a big drag on the road. Does FloTV have satelite or wifi reception?
Posted by Another short lived Dvice | February 8, 2010 - 10:02pm
Sorry to say but as a AD supported dvice it MAY work. For the extremely SLIM channel line up and actually quite hefty per month fee - it will be dead in less then 2 years at the longest. Look what happened to the other cellular TV service - ATT had to buy them so they wouldnt go under after only 2 years. Handheld HDTV's with freeAIR is the way to go - not this route. It's amazing what sheeple are misinformed via the cable/DTV scam of how easy and clear freeAIR HDTV reception is (in a major market area ofcourse). By the coverage footprint I would never justify this for a hunting trip or even camping - you'd be out in the woods with no coverage and by the same footprint a handheld HDTV freeAIR receiver would actually be the forerunner - cost almost half of this thing, no monthly fees and digital signal to boot. If this thing sported a complete 150+ digital line-up AND a coverage footprint like verizscam it MIGHT be worth 10 bucks a month. And if you do cheese this out and pony up the $14.95 a month - remember YOUR still getting ads forced into your brain cells WHICH THEY are pocketing. I see this as the OGO - just say O NO to another wishful thunkin product. IMHO
Posted by Another short lived Dvice | February 8, 2010 - 10:03pm
Sorry to say but as a AD supported dvice it MAY work. For the extremely SLIM channel line up and actually quite hefty per month fee - it will be dead in less then 2 years at the longest. Look what happened to the other cellular TV service - ATT had to buy them so they wouldnt go under after only 2 years. Handheld HDTV's with freeAIR is the way to go - not this route. It's amazing what sheeple are misinformed via the cable/DTV scam of how easy and clear freeAIR HDTV reception is (in a major market area ofcourse). By the coverage footprint I would never justify this for a hunting trip or even camping - you'd be out in the woods with no coverage and by the same footprint a handheld HDTV freeAIR receiver would actually be the forerunner - cost almost half of this thing, no monthly fees and digital signal to boot. If this thing sported a complete 150+ digital line-up AND a coverage footprint like verizscam it MIGHT be worth 10 bucks a month. And if you do cheese this out and pony up the $14.95 a month - remember YOUR still getting ads forced into your brain cells WHICH THEY are pocketing. I see this as the OGO - just say O NO to another wishful thunkin product. IMHO
Comments (6) | Post a comment